Welcome To Know Our Products, We Can Offer You High Quality Products!
WhatsApp / WeChat:
Email:
Welcome To Know Our Products, We Can Offer You High Quality Products!
WhatsApp / WeChat:
Email:
SP 8/6 Submersible Pump Rubber Lining Aging Inspection: From Hardness Test to Ultrasonic Thickness Measurement
Release time:
2026-04-16
Author:
Source:
Abstract
SP 8/6 Submersible Pump Rubber Lining Aging Inspection: From Hardness Test to Ultrasonic Thickness Measurement
Subtitle: Shore hardness, ultrasonic thickness, visual inspection – a 3‑step method to accurately assess rubber lining aging and prevent casing corrosion
Introduction
The SP 8/6 submersible slurry pump (200mm discharge, 150mm inlet) is widely used in slurry pits, tailings sumps, and chemical wastewater applications. Its wet end is often rubber‑lined to resist chemical corrosion from acidic media and erosive wear from fine particles. However, rubber is an organic polymer that gradually ages due to temperature, chemical attack, and mechanical stress. Aged rubber becomes hard, cracked, and loses elasticity, eventually leading to lining detachment. The pump casing is then directly exposed to corrosive slurry, resulting in perforation and scrap.
Field maintenance personnel often rely on visual inspection alone, which is insufficient to accurately determine remaining rubber life. This article introduces three field‑applicable methods: visual inspection, Shore hardness testing, and ultrasonic thickness measurement, with replacement thresholds and step‑by‑step procedures. As a professional slurry pump manufacturer, we aim to help users make data‑driven decisions.
1. Signs and Hazards of Rubber Lining Aging
| Aging stage | Typical signs | Consequences |
|---|---|---|
| Early | Slight discoloration, loss of gloss | Performance normal, continue operation |
| Moderate | Fine surface cracks (crazing), increased hardness | Reduced wear resistance, accelerated erosion |
| Severe | Crack propagation, localized detachment, hardening, loss of elasticity | Metal casing exposed, corrosion perforation |
| Failure | Large‑area lining detachment, casing leakage | Pump scrapped, high replacement cost |
Key point: Rubber aging is gradual. Replacing at the moderate stage has the lowest cost. Waiting until the severe stage damages the casing, multiplying repair costs.
2. Method 1: Visual Inspection (Rapid Screening)
Visual inspection is the simplest initial method, recommended monthly.
| Item | Normal | Aging sign | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Color | Uniform black or original | Whitish, gray, spots | Increase monitoring |
| Gloss | Glossy | Dull, matte | Pay attention |
| Cracks | None visible | Fine crazing (like dry soil) | Plan replacement |
| Elasticity | Springs back when pressed | Indent remains or no rebound | Schedule replacement |
| Detachment | None | Small pieces peeling off | Urgent replacement |
Tip: Use a flashlight at an oblique angle to highlight fine cracks. Focus on high‑velocity areas such as the inlet and volute.
3. Method 2: Shore Hardness Test (Quantify Aging)
The most direct physical change during rubber aging is hardening. Fresh rubber lining typically has a Shore hardness of 55–65 Shore A. As aging progresses, hardness rises to 70–80 Shore A or higher.
3.1 Tools
| Tool | Specification | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Shore durometer (Type A) | Shore A, range 0–100 | Measure rubber surface hardness |
| Calibration block | Supplied | Verify before use |
3.2 Procedure
| Step | Action | Key points |
|---|---|---|
| ① Clean surface | Wipe with dry cloth | No oil or slurry residue |
| ② Select points | At least 5 points across different areas (inlet, outlet, volute) | Average value |
| ③ Measure | Press durometer foot perpendicularly into rubber, hold 1–2 sec, read | Avoid cracks and defects |
| ④ Record | Log each reading | Compare with baseline |
3.3 Interpretation
| Hardness (Shore A) | Condition | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|
| 55–65 | Good | Normal operation |
| 65–70 | Mild aging | Monitor, retest every 3 months |
| 70–75 | Moderate aging | Plan replacement within 6 months |
| >75 | Severe aging | Schedule immediate replacement |
Note: Different rubber compounds (natural, butyl, neoprene) have different initial hardness. Use measured values from new lining as baseline.
4. Method 3: Ultrasonic Thickness Measurement (Quantify Remaining Thickness)
Rubber lining thickness gradually decreases due to wear and aging. An ultrasonic thickness gauge can non‑destructively measure remaining thickness – the most accurate quantitative method.
4.1 Tools
| Tool | Specification | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Ultrasonic thickness gauge | With rubber‑specific probe (2–5 MHz) | Measure lining thickness |
| Couplant | Glycerin or specialized gel | Eliminate air gaps |
4.2 Procedure
| Step | Action | Key points |
|---|---|---|
| ① Calibrate | Calibrate with standard test block | Ensure accuracy |
| ② Mark grid | Mark a grid on casing (e.g., 100×100 mm) | Cover entire lining area |
| ③ Apply couplant | Apply small amount to measurement point | Thin, even layer |
| ④ Measure | Press probe perpendicularly, read thickness | Wait for stable reading |
| ⑤ Record | Create thickness distribution map | Identify thinnest point |
4.3 Interpretation
| Remaining thickness ratio | Condition | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|
| >80% of original | Good | Normal operation |
| 60%–80% | Noticeable wear | Plan replacement |
| <60% of original | Severe wear | Immediate replacement |
Original thickness: Design thickness of new lining (typically 10–25 mm depending on pump size). For SP 8/6, inlet lining ~20 mm, volute area ~15 mm.
5. Combined Decision Matrix
Use all three methods together for replacement decisions:
| Visual | Hardness (Shore A) | Remaining thickness | Decision |
|---|---|---|---|
| Good | <65 | >80% | Continue operation |
| Fine crazing | 65–70 | 60%–80% | Plan replacement within 6 months |
| Obvious cracks, discoloration | 70–75 | 50%–60% | Replace within 3 months |
| Cracks through, detachment | >75 | <50% | Immediate replacement |
6. Daily Maintenance Recommendations
| Measure | Frequency | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Visual inspection | Monthly | Early detection of cracks, detachment |
| Shore hardness test | Every 3 months | Quantify aging progress |
| Ultrasonic thickness | Every 6 months | Track thickness trend |
| Record keeping | Each measurement | Build aging database, predict life |
Conclusion
Assessing rubber lining aging in SP 8/6 submersible pumps cannot rely on visual inspection alone. Combining visual inspection, Shore hardness testing, and ultrasonic thickness measurement provides a scientific evaluation of remaining lining life, avoiding both premature replacement (waste) and delayed replacement (casing corrosion). Establish a regular inspection schedule and record data for trend analysis.
As a professional slurry pump manufacturer, we offer rubber lining replacement services and on‑site inspection training. For lining aging diagnostics or replacement solutions, please contact our technical team.
Key words:
SP 8/6 submersible pump, rubber lining aging, Shore hardness test, ultrasonic thickness measurement, rubber lining replacement, corrosion protection, submersible pump maintenance, slurry pump manufacturer, rubber hardness assessment, casing corrosion prevention
Recommend Reading
The New Option for your Old Warman Slurry Pump
2026-03-23
Performance Benefits of Ceramic Wet Parts in High-Abrasion Slurry Pumps
2026-01-23
How to Choose the Right Slurry Pump Parts for Industrial Applications
2025-12-25








