Welcome To Know Our Products, We Can Offer You High Quality Products!
WhatsApp / WeChat:
Email:
Welcome To Know Our Products, We Can Offer You High Quality Products!
WhatsApp / WeChat:
Email:
Field Adjustment of Impeller‑Volute Clearance for GH 150 High‑Head Gravel Pump: Comparison of Shim Method and Grinding Method
Release time:
2026-05-14
Author:
Source:
Abstract
Field Adjustment of Impeller‑Volute Clearance for GH 150 High‑Head Gravel Pump: Comparison of Shim Method and Grinding Method
Introduction
The GH 150 is a high‑head GH series gravel pump (150mm discharge), with single‑stage head up to 60‑80 meters. It is widely used in river sand mining, reclamation, and long‑distance gravel transport – applications involving large particles and high abrasion. The radial clearance between the impeller and volute is a critical parameter affecting pump efficiency and particle passage capability. Excessive clearance increases internal leakage and reduces efficiency; insufficient clearance causes coarse particles (cobbles, gravel) to jam between the impeller and volute, leading to impeller seizure, motor overload, and even pump casing damage.
When clearance exceeds the allowable limit during field repair, two adjustment methods are commonly used: the shim method (adjusting the impeller‘s axial position to change radial clearance) and the grinding method (directly grinding the volute inner wall or impeller outer diameter). Each method has its own applicability, operation points, and risks. Based on extensive field practice, Hebei Xingou Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. compares the characteristics, accuracy, risks, and procedures of these two methods, helping users choose the most suitable adjustment approach for their specific conditions.
1. Criteria for Excessive Clearance
For a new GH 150 gravel pump, the factory radial clearance is typically 0.5‑0.7 mm. As operating hours accumulate, the impeller outer diameter and volute inner wall wear due to slurry erosion, causing clearance to increase gradually.
| Clearance range (mm) | Condition | Recommended action |
|---|---|---|
| 0.5 – 0.8 | Good | Normal operation, periodic monitoring |
| 0.8 – 1.2 | Slight exceedance | Plan adjustment at next scheduled shutdown |
| 1.2 – 1.8 | Moderate exceedance | Schedule adjustment soon |
| > 1.8 | Severe exceedance | Immediate adjustment or wear part replacement |
Measurement method: Stop the pump, remove the cover, and use a feeler gauge to measure the radial clearance at 3‑4 points around the impeller circumference. Average the readings. Also measure the impeller OD and volute ID to verify the calculated clearance.
2. Adjustment Method 1: Shim Method
2.1 Principle
The shim method involves adding or removing shims at the joint between the bearing housing and the bracket, thereby changing the impeller‘s axial position. Because the volute flow passage is involute‑shaped, axial movement of the impeller changes the radial clearance at the discharge. Moving the impeller toward the pump inlet (adding shims) reduces radial clearance; moving it toward the motor (removing shims) increases radial clearance.
2.2 Procedure
| Step | Action | Key points |
|---|---|---|
| ① Remove bearing cover | Remove pump‑end bearing cover to expose the joint between bearing housing and bracket | Record original shim thickness and position |
| ② Calculate required shim thickness | Required adjustment = Current clearance – Target clearance | Target clearance typically 0.6‑0.8 mm |
| ③ Add or remove shims | Add shims to move impeller toward inlet (reduce clearance) | Use stainless steel shims; no more than 4 per stack |
| ④ Tighten bolts | Tighten bearing housing bolts in diagonal sequence | Torque to manufacturer specification |
| ⑤ Re‑measure clearance | Reassemble and measure radial clearance | Fine‑tune if necessary |
2.3 Advantages and Limitations
| Advantages | Limitations |
|---|---|
| No machining; field‑operable | Limited adjustment range (≤1.5 mm per session) |
| No damage to wear parts | Only applicable to pumps with adjustable axial design |
| Allows multiple fine adjustments | Requires bearing disassembly; more labor‑intensive |
| High precision (can be controlled to ±0.1 mm) | Requires skilled operator |
3. Adjustment Method 2: Grinding Method
3.1 Principle
The grinding method directly removes material from the volute inner wall or impeller outer diameter to change the fit size, thereby adjusting radial clearance. When clearance is too large (need to reduce it), the volute inner wall is ground. When clearance is too small or there are localized high spots on the impeller, the impeller outer diameter is ground.
3.2 Procedure
| Step | Action | Key points |
|---|---|---|
| ① Mark the area | Identify the area with minimum (or maximum) clearance | Mark with a marker |
| ② Select grinding target | Large clearance → grind volute inner wall; small clearance or high spots → grind impeller OD | Prefer grinding the easier‑to‑replace component |
| ③ Rough grinding | Use angle grinder or rotary tool to remove material | Small increments, 0.1‑0.2 mm at a time |
| ④ Measure | Re‑measure clearance after each pass | When near target, switch to fine abrasive |
| ⑤ Finish | Use fine sandpaper or oilstone to polish the ground surface | Achieve Ra ≤1.6 μm |
| ⑥ Clean | Remove metal dust and blow clean | Prevent debris from entering bearing cavity |
3.3 Advantages and Limitations
| Advantages | Limitations |
|---|---|
| Large adjustment range (can exceed 2 mm) | Requires skill; easy to over‑grind |
| No bearing disassembly; time‑saving | Surface finish difficult to guarantee |
| Suitable for pumps with limited access | Irreversible; over‑grinding requires part replacement |
| Can eliminate local high spots | May slightly alter flow passage shape and efficiency |
4. Comparison of the Two Methods
| Aspect | Shim Method | Grinding Method |
|---|---|---|
| Adjustment principle | Change impeller axial position | Directly change fit dimensions |
| Adjustment range | 0.1‑1.5 mm | 0.1‑3.0 mm or more |
| Precision | High (±0.05 mm) | Moderate (±0.1 mm, operator‑dependent) |
| Reversibility | Reversible (shims can be added/removed) | Irreversible (material removal) |
| Damage to wear parts | None | Yes (material removed) |
| Time required | 2‑4 hours (requires bearing disassembly) | 1‑2 hours |
| Tools required | Standard wrenches, feeler gauge | Angle grinder, sandpaper, feeler gauge |
| Best suited for | Uniform clearance increase, precise restoration | Localized wear, high spots, inaccessible pumps |
| Effect on efficiency | None (restores original clearance) | May slightly affect flow passage |
| Priority recommendation | First choice (non‑destructive) | Use when shim method not feasible |
5. Case Study: GH 150 Clearance Adjustment at a Sand Mining Site
Background: A GH 150 gravel pump had operated for about 3,000 hours. Efficiency had noticeably decreased, and discharge pressure was low. Measurement showed that the impeller‑volute radial clearance had increased from the initial 0.6 mm to 1.4 mm.
Adjustment: The shim method was chosen as the first option. A 0.8 mm stainless steel shim was added between the bearing housing and bracket, moving the impeller toward the pump inlet. After reassembly, the clearance was measured at 0.65 mm.
Results:
Pump efficiency recovered to 96% of the new pump level.
Discharge pressure returned to normal, and flow met requirements.
After 1,000 hours of operation, the clearance showed no significant change.
Alternative experience: On another pump, the volute inner wall had localized severe wear (irregular pits). After shim adjustment, the clearance remained uneven (1.2 mm at max, 0.7 mm at min). The volute inner wall was uniformly ground to eliminate irregularities, achieving a final clearance of 0.7‑0.8 mm, with good results.
6. Selection Decision Guide
| Condition | Recommended method | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Uniform clearance increase (1.0‑1.5 mm) | Shim method | Non‑destructive, high precision, reversible |
| Localized wear or grooves in volute | Grinding method | Eliminate high spots, achieve uniform clearance |
| Pump cannot be disassembled (e.g., welded piping) | Grinding method | No need to disassemble bearing assembly |
| Impeller OD has noticeable wear steps | Grinding method (grind impeller) | Remove steps, restore smooth surface |
| Precise restoration of factory performance needed | Shim method | Controllable precision, good consistency |
| Limited tools on site, need quick restoration | Grinding method | Fast, simple tools |
Conclusion
For adjusting the impeller‑volute radial clearance of a GH 150 high‑head gravel pump, the shim method is the preferred choice. It is non‑destructive, precise, and reversible, effectively restoring pump efficiency and extending wear part life. When clearance is uneven, localized wear is severe, or the pump cannot be disassembled, the grinding method serves as a complementary approach to quickly resolve the issue. Regardless of the method used, always re‑measure the clearance after adjustment and perform static balancing (if the impeller was ground). Hebei Xingou Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. offers on‑site clearance measurement and adjustment services. Please contact us.
Key words:
GH 150 high-head gravel pump, impeller-volute clearance, shim method, grinding method, radial clearance adjustment, gravel pump maintenance, pump efficiency restoration, Hebei Xingou Machinery, large particle transport, field adjustment
Recommend Reading
The New Option for your Old Warman Slurry Pump
2026-03-23
Performance Benefits of Ceramic Wet Parts in High-Abrasion Slurry Pumps
2026-01-23
How to Choose the Right Slurry Pump Parts for Industrial Applications
2025-12-25






