Welcome To Know Our Products, We Can Offer You High Quality Products!
WhatsApp / WeChat:
Email:
Welcome To Know Our Products, We Can Offer You High Quality Products!
WhatsApp / WeChat:
Email:
6/4D-AH vs 4/3C-AH Slurry Pump: How to Choose for Small to Medium Mill Discharge?
Release time:
2026-04-09
Author:
Source:
Abstract
6/4D-AH vs 4/3C-AH Slurry Pump: How to Choose for Small to Medium Mill Discharge?
Subtitle: A Complete Comparison of Flow, Head, Particle Size, and Operating Cost for Two Classic AH Small-Bore Pumps
Introduction
In small to medium mineral processing plants, mill discharge (ball mill or SAG mill outlet) slurry transport is a critical operation. The 6/4D-AH and 4/3C-AH are two widely used small-bore slurry pumps in the AH series, commonly applied in duties with flow rates of 50–250 m³/h and heads of 10–40 meters. Many users are confused: with similar discharge sizes, which one should you choose?
Choosing the wrong model can lead to higher energy consumption, rapid wear part failure, or even inability to meet mill discharge requirements. As a professional slurry pump manufacturer, this article provides a detailed comparison of the 6/4D-AH and 4/3C-AH pumps from the perspectives of dimensional parameters, hydraulic performance, particle passage, application scenarios, and operating costs – helping small to medium concentrators make accurate decisions.
4/3C-AH
1. Model Naming and Basic Dimensions
In AH series naming, the first number represents discharge diameter (inches), and the second number represents inlet diameter (inches). Understanding this rule is the first step in selection.
| Model | Discharge Diameter (mm) | Inlet Diameter (mm) | Impeller Diameter Range (mm) | Casing Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4/3C-AH | 100 (4 inches) | 75 (3 inches) | 280–350 | Compact, C-type |
| 6/4D-AH | 150 (6 inches) | 100 (4 inches) | 380–450 | Standard, D-type |
2. Hydraulic Performance Comparison
| Performance Parameter | 4/3C-AH | 6/4D-AH | Selection Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Optimal flow range (m³/h) | 30 – 120 | 50 – 250 | 6/4D-AH covers larger flow range |
| Optimal head range (m) | 10 – 35 | 10 – 45 | 6/4D-AH has advantage at higher head |
| Max particle passage (mm) | ~45 | ~70 | 6/4D-AH handles coarser particles |
| Peak efficiency (%) | ~60% | ~65% | 6/4D-AH more efficient |
| Motor power range (kW) | 7.5 – 45 | 15 – 90 | 6/4D-AH requires larger power |
| Impeller tip speed (m/s) | Medium | Higher | Higher speed affects wear rate |
3. Application Scenarios
3.1 Suitable Applications for 4/3C-AH
| Application | Description |
|---|---|
| Small ball mill discharge (throughput <50 t/h) | Flow typically 30-80 m³/h, within 4/3C-AH high-efficiency zone |
| Cyclone feed (small-diameter cyclone clusters) | Head requirement 15-25 m, stable operation |
| Closed-circuit grinding with low circulating load | Slurry concentration 30%-45%, acceptable wear life |
| Medium or concentrate transport (short distance) | Low head requirement, cost-effective |
3.2 Suitable Applications for 6/4D-AH
| Application | Description |
|---|---|
| Medium ball mill discharge (throughput 50-120 t/h) | Flow 100-200 m³/h, within 6/4D-AH high-efficiency zone |
| Coarse grinding circuit discharge (coarse particles) | Particle passage up to 70 mm, reduced clogging risk |
| Cyclone feed (multiple small cyclones or one large cyclone) | Head up to 40+ meters |
| Long-distance transport between mill and classifier | High head ensures conveying capacity |
4. Key Selection Factors Comparison
| Selection Factor | 4/3C-AH | 6/4D-AH | Decision Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design flow | ≤120 m³/h | ≥80 m³/h | For overlap range 80-120 m³/h, evaluate comprehensively |
| Design head | ≤35 m | 10-45 m | For head >35 m, prioritize 6/4D-AH |
| Max particle size | ≤45 mm | ≤70 mm | For coarse particles (>45mm), choose 6/4D-AH |
| Installation space | Compact, small footprint | Slightly larger | Choose 4/3C-AH for space-constrained sites |
| Initial investment | Lower | Higher | Choose 4/3C-AH if budget is tight and conditions match |
| Operating energy | Slightly higher specific energy | Lower specific energy at high flow | Calculate electricity cost for long-term operation |
| Spare parts cost | Smaller parts, cheaper | Larger parts, more expensive | Based on replacement frequency |
5. Selection Decision Flowchart
6. Case Study: 100 t/h Iron Ore Mill Discharge
| Item | 4/3C-AH | 6/4D-AH |
|---|---|---|
| Flow (m³/h) | 100 | 100 |
| Head (m) | 22 | 22 |
| Impeller diameter (mm) | 340 | 400 |
| Speed (rpm) | 1200 | 950 |
| Shaft power (kW) | ~38 | ~35 |
| Impeller life (hours) | ~2500 | ~4000 |
| Annual spare parts cost | Higher | Lower (longer life) |
Conclusion: Although the 6/4D-AH has about 25% higher initial investment, its lower speed and slower wear result in lower total cost over 3 years compared to the 4/3C-AH.
7. Common Selection Mistakes
| Mistake | Correct Approach |
|---|---|
| “4/3C-AH and 6/4D-AH are just different sizes; they can be swapped arbitrarily” | Hydraulic designs differ significantly; select based on actual flow and head |
| “Larger is always better; use 6/4D-AH for all small to medium duties” | At low flow, large pump runs off BEP → low efficiency, high wear |
| “If particle size is ≤45mm, 4/3C-AH is always suitable” | Sharp particles or high concentration may still require larger passages |
| “Only look at flow, ignore head and pipeline losses” | Insufficient head will cause mill discharge backup |
Conclusion
Both the 6/4D-AH and 4/3C-AH are excellent choices for small to medium mill discharge, but each has distinct strengths:
4/3C-AH is suitable for flow ≤120 m³/h, head ≤35 m, particle size ≤45 mm, budget-conscious or space-constrained projects. It is an economical choice for small ball mill discharge.
6/4D-AH is suitable for flow ≥80 m³/h, head up to 45 m, particle size ≤70 mm, and for medium plants pursuing low wear and long life. Though initial investment is higher, the lifecycle cost is lower.
Proper selection requires comprehensive consideration of flow, head, particle characteristics, installation conditions, and long-term operating costs. As a professional slurry pump manufacturer, we offer free selection consulting. Provide your mill discharge parameters for a tailored recommendation.
Key words:
6/4D-AH slurry pump, 4/3C-AH slurry pump, small to medium mill discharge, AH slurry pump selection, mill discharge pump, ball mill discharge pump, slurry pump comparison, slurry pump manufacturer, mineral processing equipment, slurry pump selection guide
Recommend Reading
The New Option for your Old Warman Slurry Pump
2026-03-23
Performance Benefits of Ceramic Wet Parts in High-Abrasion Slurry Pumps
2026-01-23
How to Choose the Right Slurry Pump Parts for Industrial Applications
2025-12-25









